Due to the fact there will not seem like any "Formal" Load Data available for this Load, can several of you provide a starting point with this mix and items to consider when working this Load up?
H4831 will perform during the Swift but not true perfectly. You can expect to in no way receive the pressures you need for consistency Along with the .223. 760, or H414 will probably be improved but for some motive I ain't the biggest enthusiast of most ball powders.
This is without doubt one of the greatest causes reloaders are admonished to work with new data only; and to start out very low when you get a brand new wide range of powder. You do not definitely know (unless the company informs you so) that the new large amount of powder was even manufactured at the identical manufacturing unit because the powder you acquire a several years in the past.
Together with the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me great groups and superior velocity, but Rottweil R905 provides a noticeably better velocity and gives marginally much better precision. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos during the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave exceptional precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally much better. Therefore, in Every single of these scenarios I went with One more powder, but I would certainly detest to divest myself of your H4831.
INgunner54 mentioned: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Discovered a node and shot some groups.
Because there won't seem like any h4831 vs h4831sc "Formal" Load Data in existence for this Load, can a few of you give a starting point with this mixture and things to think about when Performing this Load up?
I am employing it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as accurate. RL22 did well but I had been slightly concerned about temp stability. I do think I'm at 72 grains and have all over 2850ish fps
excaliber claimed: I've found the exact reverse to become genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly accurate powder in my three hundred Gain Mag.
Using the quick Lower Edition powder comes around the base from the reduce shoulder so I nevertheless have a lot of space.
Why would I mention this? Just what is my point? I'm unsure that there's a real valid position in addition to what exactly is well known with most hasn't been well-liked with me in any way in these instances. Do I just have a powder jinx or some thing? Only to teach you how crazy I actually am, tomorrow I'm selection screening a pals new .
Confirm YOUR AGE Sure states prohibit marketing or promoting of firearms, ammunition, and related firearm components to minors. We’d like to make certain you’re 18 many years of age or older ahead of allowing for you h4831sc load data to buy our website. Have you been eighteen yrs of age or more mature?
Immediately after looking at this text (and plenty of Other individuals, but this 1 is easily the most data pushed with many accredited shooters) I've stopped stressing about touching or currently being inside a magical length through the lands, and started loading where by I could enhance numerous components of a load. Just my .02, ideally you can get a thing to work for ya.
Can I suppose that H4831 can be substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the Actual physical big difference but will it impact the melt away or velocity? I think not but I h4831sc load data am not a hundred% confident.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are various. Wherever you may be baffling it and believing that it really is shut is H4831 and H4831SC are very related. Those two are virtually the exact same except H4831SC is created to scaled-down grains so it meters easier.